Xalios
Get a Demo
Company

Why we
built this.

Software that reads documents well has existed for years. What has been missing is a way to let it decide anything without losing the account of who decided what. That gap is the whole reason this company exists.

Book a demo→

The problem, seen up close

In every company we worked with, the same pattern: a queue of documents, a small number of people who understood it, and no written account of why any particular call was made. The knowledge was real and the work was competent. It simply was not recoverable.

Then the tooling arrived that could read all of it. What did not arrive was any way to answer the question a finance director, a general counsel or an auditor asks immediately: who decided this, what did they know, and what were they allowed to do. Without that answer, nobody sensible lets software decide anything that matters.

What we started from

Reading documents at scale is a solved problem.Deciding from them is not, because deciding requires someone to be answerable.So the record is not a feature bolted on afterwards. It is the product.
Where this comes from

Years spent building document intelligence, at volumes where mistakes are visible

Our founding work was building systems that read commercial documents in production, for organisations where a wrong extraction did not stay theoretical for long. That is where the lesson came from: accuracy is necessary and nowhere near sufficient. What determines whether anyone will use the output is whether they can defend it afterwards.

So we built the governance first, and made the capability earn its way up through it. That order is unusual and it is deliberate.

Registered

United Kingdom

Stage

Solution partner programme, by invitation

Certifications

None yet, and we say so on the trust and compliance page rather than in the small print

Why governance, not capability

Capability is improving whether we work on it or not. The part nobody else is doing is making the authority explicit, revocable and recorded.

Authority is a state, not a switch

Five levels, granted by a person, for one kind of work at a time, and able to go down as well as up. That is how trust works with people, and we could not find a good argument for it working differently here.

The record is written as it happens

Not reconstructed on request. What arrived, what was known, what was permitted, what was decided and by whom, replayable as it stood at the time.

Some limits are not configurable

Payments above your threshold, irreversible commitments, clinical decisions. You can draw those lines tighter than we do. You cannot draw them looser, and neither can we.

What this company will not do

Sell headcount reductionWe do not price against salaries and we do not promise fewer people. The case is that judgement work displaces paperwork, and we would rather that be true than convenient.
Claim certifications we do not holdNo enterprise-grade hand-waving in place of an audit. The trust and compliance page lists what exists and what does not, and it will keep doing that as things change.
Train shared models on your documentsYour material is yours. What is sent to a model provider, and what is not, is named rather than described in the abstract.
Sell to companies we cannot help yetThere is a page listing who this is not for, and we send people to it. A pilot that should not have started costs everyone more than a no.
Who it's for, and who it isn't →
How to reach usA person answers, and says no when the answer is no.Pilot enquiries, security and procurement questions, support and press, each with a route and a response time we will hold to.Contact →

If you want to see whether any of this is true, bring one real process.

Get a Demo→